Tascam 244 Portastudio

Tascam 244 Portastudio

The year was 1982, Tascam introduced the Tascam 244 Portastudio, and in doing so they managed to change the recording world forever, particularly for home musicians! This was also a game changing moment for recording studios.

Tascam 244 Portastudio Details

In 1979 Tascam released the Tascam 144 Portastudio to the world, and to say it caught on would be an understatement. Bruce Springsteen recorded his Nebraska album using the 144 and two Shure SM57 microphones. The 144 meant you could carry a studio with you when on the road or take it to a fellow musician’s house to lay down a track or two, then go back home and mix it down, all on the one machine. It was a revelation, but it wasn’t perfect, it had limited equalisation options, but it succeeded and in 1982 Tascam delivered its replacement, the Tascam 244 Portastudio.

It was at this point in my own life as a budding song writer, that I jumped on board and bought the Tascam 244 Portastudio. Having recently completed my training at SAE (School of Audio Engineering) in Surry Hills, Sydney, I was ready to take on the world. I produced hundreds of recordings on my Tascam 244 in the years I had it, I truly loved the thing.

It was so easy to use, had really great sound quality (thanks in part to the excellent DBX noise reduction system which provided a claimed 90Db noise floor!) and given the way I used it, produced excellent results. The addition of two band parametric EQ allowed for much better tuning of the sound being recorded, and the ability to record on all four tracks simultaneously allowed greater flexibility too.

Unlike other users, and unlike it was intended to be used I must say, I never did the bounce down thing with my Tascam 244. I was fortunate to have a couple of Sony DAT recorders at the time so I would put a MIDI time code onto track 4 to sync with my keyboards and drum machines, then lay down guitars and bass on the remaining three tracks. I would then mix that out to the Sony DTC-1000ES DAT Recorder.

When I was happy with that mix, I would then record the DATs stereo mix back into the Tascam 244 on track 1 and 2, leaving me with two tracks for vocals. If I needed more than two vocal tracks, I would then mix that out to the DAT recorder, feed it back in on tracks 1 and 2 and add another two vocal tracks.

The final step of course was the final mix out to the DAT recorder, and job done. Was this a better process than bouncing down within the 244 itself? Absolutely, the results spoke for themselves. It did not make me a famous song writer, but it did allow my band at the time to secure live work off the strength of the demos we recorded on the Tascam 244.

I eventually moved on to an 8 track Portastudio (a Tascam 488) which I never loved as much as the 244, and then of course to an ADAT and Mackie 1604 that was having it’s day in the sun during the early 1990s, but I loved that setup even less.

Tascam 244
Tascam 244 Portastudio Metering

Ultimately it was the ease of use, and simplicity of the Tascam 244 that cemented it in the hearts of so many musicians at the time. Yes, better sound quality could be had from a reel-to-reel setup but try lugging that over to your bass players house to lay down some tracks! Many products followed from Tascam, Fostex and others, but it is the Tascam 244 Portastudio  that is responsible for the home recording studio phenomena that followed. It may not have been for the wealthy recording artist, but it allowed so many up-and-coming musicians the ability to turn out great quality demos from home, and without the expense of a recording studio, and that, to the determent of recording studios the world over, changed the world of recording forever.

The Tascam 244 Portastudio is an extremely versatile tool for creative people in a variety of fields: musicians, vocalists, arrangers, composers, multi-image producers, and film/video producers. The 244 is a complete recording system. Incorporating a full-function mixer and a high-performance 4-channel multitrack cassette recorder. Plug in microphones, instruments, and a pair of headphones or two, and you have everything needed to begin recording.

Sophisticated features
Each input channel has a 2-band parametric type sweep equaliser, plus an “off” position on the Mic/Line Tape switch for muting unused channels. The 244 accepts up to 4 microphones, line-level sources, or electronic instruments without the need for a ‘direct box”. There are a variety of outputs for mixdown to any 2-track recorder, and for monitoring via headphones and /or loudspeakers (with an external amplifier system).

The Tascam 244 also has numerous patch points which, channel-by-channel, allow the insertion of a variety of outboard signal processors. The aux mixing buss is stereo, so it can be used for an effects send mix or an additional performer headphone cue mix. And the Remote Punch [n/ Out footswitch jack means performers working alone can plug in an optional footswitch (RC-30P) and “punch -in” the record mode without a beat.

Tascam 244
Tascam 244 Portastudio Mixer

The Mixer Section
The 244 Portastudio’s mixer section has everything needed to record live performances, mix recorded tracks with new sources during overdubs, to create separate mixes for effects and performer monitoring, and to remix the multitrack cassette to a finished stereo program. It can even be used for occasional live sound reinforcement mixing. Channel controls include Mic/Line-Off-Tape selectors, trim controls and overload indicators, two-band parametric EQ, Aux gain and pan controls with Pre-Off-Post selectors, pan pots and smooth, noise-free linear faders.

The master control section includes a REMIX / CUE/ AUX monitor selector and buss monitor control for versatile monitoring, a record function switch matrix which permits recording on independent channels or all 4 channels simultaneously, Aux receive controls, tape cue gain and pan controls, and a master fader for overall level control.

The Recorder
The built-in 9.5 cm/sec cassette recorder features dbx noise reduction and is calibrated for optimum performance with high bias, 70 gs EQ tapes. Audible tape hiss is virtually eliminated, recordable dynamic range is significantly increased, and distortion is markedly reduced. The use of high-speed integrated circuits, in conjunction with the higher tape speed, further improves high frequency response and reduces distortion.

One of the transport’s three motors is used only for moving the heads in and out of position, thus preserving alignment. Reliability is further ensured because the capstan motor turns on only when a cassette is in place. Convenient features include a large, fluorescent 4-digit tape counter, a Zero Return function, 4 independent Tape Out jacks, and a ± 15% pitch control.

Tascam 244
Tascam 244 Portastudio Transport Controls

DBX Explained
DBX is a wide-band compression-expansion system which provides a net noise reduction (broadband, not just hiss) of a little more than 30 dB. In addition, the compression during recording permits a net gain in tape headroom of about 10 dB. A compression factor of 2.1 is used before recording; then, 1:2 expansion on reproduce.

These compression and expansion factors are linear in decibels and allow the system to produce tape recordings over a 100 dB dynamic range an important feature, especially when you’re making live recordings. The DBX employs RMS level sensors to eliminate compressor-expander tracking errors due to phase shifts in the tape recorder and provides excellent transient tracking capabilities.

To achieve a large reduction in audible tape hiss, without danger of overload or high frequency self-erasure on the tape, frequency pre-emphasis and de-emphasis are added to the signal and RMS level sensors. If you’re an electronics engineer, all of the above gab may tell you the whole story of what’s going on in DBX, but if you’re not, to make things a little easier to understand we’ll ask you to use your imagination. Imagine four little recording engineers in the box their hands on a volume control.

They are incredibly fast but very stupid, so you must give them a set of rules. You tell them to raise signals that are below “0VU” and reduce signals that are higher than “0VU” The lower the signal is, the more they raise it, and the higher levels above “0VU” get lowered more and more as they go up in level past “0”.

This is the 2:1 compression. You also tell them to call “0.316 V” “0VU”. Here they do nothing, no change except frequency pre-emphasis or boost. Since you know, they are going to keep the high levels under control, you can raise the “‘top end” a bit and still not overload the tape.

Just to keep it simple for them, the boost in highs is fixed. They put it in all the time no matter what level changes they are making. Now we play the tape back, and say 0K, do everything backwards. Levels above ‘ ‘0.316 V” “0 VU” are raised and levels below ‘”0.316 V” are lowered, and while you’re at it, fellows, take off the extra top end as well. Follow the rules in reverse.

As long as you don’t confuse them by shifting the “0VU” point, they work just great, but – don’t put in more than ‘ ‘0.316 V” as zero VU, and don’t make the tape playback zero anything other than “0.316 V’ either. As we said they’re very dumb and will follow instructions very precisely. Differing levels will produce decoding errors.

The reason these errors may not be objectionable is that people could have played or sung or whatever with a little more or less dynamics. A small change won’t be as noticeable as a mistake, but it is not perfect. The tolerance here is not electronic, it’s human. To get exactly what you put in, it is necessary to get an exact “0VU”. 0.316 V in and out. The system is level sensitive although it is realistic to say it is ‘artistically” forgiving.

Subsonics and Interference
DBX incorporates an effective bandpass filter with -3 dB response at 20 Hz and 30 kHz. This filter suppresses undesirable sub- and supersonic frequencies to keep them from introducing errors into the encode or decode process. However, if rumble from trains or trucks, is picked up by your microphone and fed to the DBX – filters are not perfect modulation of the program material during low level passages may occur.

This low frequency component will not itself be passed through the recorder and so, will not be present at reproduce for proper decoding. If this low-level decoding error is encountered, and subsonics are suspected, we suggest the addition of a suitable high pass filter for 244 only—in the Microphone Line or at the ACCESS-SEND-RCV jacks ahead of the DBX and after the mic pre-amplifier for further attenuation of these subsonic frequencies.

Specifications

Tape: Compact Cassette, C-60 or C-90 Use a gamma-ferric oxide tape that requires high-bias level (chrome position) and 70-microsecond EQ.
Track Format: 4-Track. One Direction
Heads: 4 Channel Erase (Ferrite) 4 Channel Record/Playback (Permalloy)
Tape Speed: 3-3/4ips. ± 1%
Pitch Control: ± 15% of normal tape speed
Wow & Flutter: ±0.06% peak (DIN/IEC/ANSI, weighted) 0.04% RMS (JIS/NAB, weighted)
Fast Wind Time: 85 seconds for C-60 tape
Motors: 1 FG Servo-controlled DC Capstan motor, 1 DC Reel motor and 1 DC Control motor
Recording Time: 15 minutes for C-60 tape
Dimension: 455(W) x 120(H) x 370(D)mm
Weight: Net: 9kg (201bs.)

MIXER SECTION

Mic/Line Input (x4)

  • Mic Impedance: 10k ohms or Less
  • Input Impedance: 60k ohms
  • Nominal Input Level: Mic -60dB (1 mV), at TRIM max, Line -IOdB (0.3 V), at TRIM min.
  • Minimum Input Level: -68 dB (0.4 mV)
  • Maximum Input Level: +15dB (5.6V)

 

Aux Rcv (x2)

  • Input Impedance: 37k ohms
  • Nominal Input Level: -10dB (0.3 V)

 

Access Send

  • Output Impedance: 100 ohms
  • Nominal Load Impedance: 10k ohms
  • Minimum Load Impedance: 1.7k ohms
  • Nominal Output Level: -10dB (0.3 V)
  • Maximum Output Level: +15 dB (5.6 V)

 

Access Rcv

  • Input Impedance: 68k Ohms
  • Nominal Input Level: -10dB (0.3 V)
  • Maximum input Level: +15 dB (5.6 V)

 

Line Out (X 2), Aux Out (X 2)

  • Output Impedance: 100 ohms
  • Nominal Load Impedance: 10k ohms
  • Minimum Load Impedance: 1 .7k ohms
  • Nominal Output Level: -10 dB (0.3 V)
  • Maximum Output Level: +15 dB (5.6 V)

 

Aux Send (X 2)

  • Output Impedance: 100 ohms
  • Nominal Load Impedance: 10k ohms
  • Minimum Load Impedance: 1 .7k ohms
  • Nominal Output Level: -10 dB (0.3 V)
  • Maximum Output Level: +15 dB (5.6 V)

 

Headphone Output (Stereo)

  • Nominal Load Impedance: 8 ohms
  • Minimum Load Impedance: 4 ohms
  • Maximum Output Level: 100 mw at 8 ohms

 

Equalizer

  • Type: Peak/ Dip Paramecic
  • Frequency: Low/ Mid. 62 Hz to 1.5k Hz
  • Mid/High, 1k Hz to 8k Hz
  • Peak/ Dip Level: ± 15 dB

 

Tape Cue (Stereo)

  • Output Impedance: 100 ohms
  • Nominal Load Impedance: 10k ohms
  • Minimum Load Impedance: 1 .7k ohms
  • Nominal Output Level: -10 dB (0.3 V)
  • Maximum Output Level: +15 dB (5.6 V)

 

Input Overload Indicator: Indication Level: 22 dB above Normal Input Level
Buss Overload Indicator

  • Indication Level:
    • 10 dB above Nominal Output Level
    • (10dB above Nominal Recording Level)

 

Frequency Response: 20Hz – 20,000Hz ±1 dB
Signal-to-Noise Ratio

  • One mic in to line out:
    • 68 dB (IHF, A weight)
    • 65 dB (unweighted)
  • One line in to line out:
    • 80 dB (IHF. A weight)
    • 76 dB (unweighted)

 

Total Harmonic Distortion: 0.05 % at 1k Hz nominal level
Crosstalk: 65dB at 1k Hz
Record Channels: 4 with DBX Type-ll NR full time Encoding
Playback Channels: 4 with DBX NR full time Decoding
Tape Out (4 Channel):

  • Output Impedance: 100 ohms
  • Nominal Load Impedance: 10k ohms
  • Minimum Load Impedance: 1 .7k ohms
  • Nominal Output Level: -10dB (0.3 V)
  • Maximum Output Level: +15 dB (5.6 V)

 

Frequency Response: 40Hz – 14,000Hz, ±3dB at O VU (Rec/Repro)
Signal-to-Noise Ratio:

  • Referenced to 3% THD Level (285nWb/m) at 315Hz
  • One line in to line out:
    • 90 dB (IHF, A weighted)
    • 75 dB (unweighted)

 

Total Harmonic Distortion: 1.5% at 31 5 Hz, 0VU level (Rec/Repro)
Crosstalk: 70 dB at 1k Hz, 0VU level
Erasure: 70 dB, referenced to 285 nWb/m at 1 kHz

TRY OUR ‘MY EFFECTS RACK’ FEATURE TO TRACK WHAT YOU HAVE IN YOUR EFFECTS RACK NOW, AND THOSE ITEMS YOU WISH TO ADD.

The details provided above are drawn from historical documents like advertising brochures or user manuals. They’re shared without bias or review. This info is given solely for your consideration, helping you gauge its usefulness to you.

User Reviews

Great Machine!

By Gary Jones

Sound Quality 90%
Build Quality 95%
Usefullness 100%
Mojo/Funk 100%
Reliability 100%

I bought one of these when they first came out in the early 80s and loved it. You have to remember the time this was, and in respect to that time, it was cutting-edge technology and total freedom for songwriters like me to start cutting demos at home. I thought the sound quality was excellent given the format being used, and sure a reel to reel sounded better, but the 244 was so portable and an all-in-one solution compared to the very heavy reel to reel options.

Used it? Leave your rating and review.

Audio Samples

There are no samples available at the moment. If you can help, please contact us.

Alternatives

Currently no information available…

Plugin Alternatives

Currently no information available…

Classic Tracks

Currently no information available…
The absence of information doesn’t necessarily mean it hasn’t been used on classic tracks or albums; it just means we don’t have the details.

Famous Racks

No results found.

Related Articles

No results found.

11 Responses

  1. Currently working on a 244 recording the album Pellucidus which will be released this summer! I traded my broken 388 for this baby! It’s perfect for me. I can’t wait to get another 388 though because ooo! Stay tuned. @suedelacymusic (Instagram)
    @suedecorderolacy (Facebook)

  2. I bought one of these second hand in 1996, I recorded tons of teenage stuff with my friends. We even released an album in our town that we’d recorded on it. I ended up selling it a few years ago for more than I’d paid for it to begin with. An amazing little machine. I used it up until the early 2000s when I switched to using a PC to record multitrack.

  3. I have a 244 that I recorded on during the 80s and 90s. After 30 years and only some basic servicing Im surprised with the soundquality. Now Im mastering old recordings with a yamaha mixer and sony portable recorder. And experimenting with new and old equipment. Finding a DAT or recordable CD player seems like a good next step to allow to expand to more tracks. pingpongtechnique at the time was tough. Loss of soundquality and very difficult to maintain good levels.

    1. Just prior to the launch of the 144 I equiped my ONKYO stereo cass deck with an xtra switchable playback amp on the left channel of the record/playback head.
      It had an headphone out, I could listen to the recorded track 1 while recording to track 2 ( not monitored )
      thus creating the first (and only, shortlived ) 2 track multitrack portastudio :-)
      Later I bought the 244 and I felt King among Kings.
      Added a spring reverb ( not clue about compressors other than my mxr dynacomp yet
      Good times.

      1. Had the same configuration. The Tascam 244, a Roland RV-100 spring reverb, and a great sounding Akai ACM-50 Elektret Microphone which I dug out and recorded with today. Still sounds very. very nice considering how cheap it was. I still have all of my equipment from the 80’s, including the Tascam 244 and all are in perfect working order.

  4. The obvious option is to buy another 244 and via your digital audio interface record the tracks into your DAW. The 244 is difficult to find in great working condition, but you can also try a Tascam 234 which is the rack mountable four track cassette deck they made. They are even rarer, but do pop up for sale fro time to time. Remember the tapes are recorded in DBX so you have to have a DBX capable machine to playback those old tapes correctly.

  5. Hi,

    I have a lot of tapes done on our 244 but the machineis long gone and sold…..is there a way to via another machine/portastudio/tascam tapedeck get the recordings out again for archival and remixes?

    1. Hi Claes,
      I would add that, if you can find a working 246, or someone with one you can either borrow or pay for the transfers, it might actually be your best option. It has the same noise reduction as the 244 and record head, meaning 244 tapes are 100% compatible. And best of all each track has an individual out that can be fed to any DAW simultaneously with the right interface.

    2. Hi. I’m in Oakland, California and I need to have my 244 evaluated and repaired.

      Know anybody in Northern California who’s got those skills?

Leave a Reply

Just a Quick

Question?

Can you tell us quickly what it is you love about Vintage Digital, and what it is you would like to see more of on the site? Is there anything you think we should add?
Let us know!