Latest User Reviews

Sound great but the -10dB input makes it better suited for old school guitar rigs and small band PAs than for the studio work that I hope to use it for. Also the Symphonic is a little too “clean” compared to the SPX-90, but still in the ballpark though.

Just ask yourself : Why can the SPX990 be found in 8 on 10 studios? Why can it be found in 8 out of 10 PA-systems ? No more comment.

This one is still worth using today. Holds up better than your VST’s, just wish it had more knobs to tweak. Reverb is digital sounding but warm enough.

I can keep this my own program and for its needs also, specifically for its complexity on different types of music today, although
Rev 5 is a vintage.

Owned the unit from 2010. Despite the evolution of technology, the REV7 is still relevant for numerous applications, giving the user instant musical & smart solutions such as : Early Reflection, Spring, Gate Reverb & more. Those are my favorite patches. I also would recommend any synth lover to try the chorus patches, especially the one called Symphonic.

OK good!

As in my other reviews on this site, I have written a detailed review on my experience over the years with the Rev 7 from its first appearance (when I first bought mine) to its usability today and how it has stood up against modern compatible reverbs.. as with all these things, some of which can be down to personal taste and different applications to which we use reverberation in music.

As time passes, I have seen a huge reduction in price and desirability in early hardware reverb units. This is now quite apparent with the big lexicons and certainly at the lower end of the market such as the SPX range and Roland’s early SRV range. Having used pretty much most of the reverbs on the market from the early eighties to the mid 90s, I now find myself buying the odd units that I don’t have because they are simply too cheap to pass by. The Yamaha Rev 5, now falls into that category and if you can find a good working one you can pay as little as $200 or less!

For this kind of money, I would challenge anyone to find better value for money. In terms of its usefulness, It needs no introduction or qualification but there are a few things that I would like to mention to anyone that is about to do the same as I have just done.

Most people that have used or heard a Rev 7 and SPX (I hope) will already know their sonic qualities. The Rev 5 (in my opinion) offers some subtle improvements in various parameters and better overall bandwidth than its predecessor. Moving on from the techie stuff, I’m still a fan of its predecessor rather than saying the rev five is an obvious replacement. To my ears, the later rev five is certainly cleaner, and the earlier reflections are somewhat improved, but it’s a personal preference as to whether they are better or not? I certainly am happy to have both units for different options.

From a technical point of you, one thing that I have discovered, is there is a definitive fault in the two digit LED failing on quite a few units that have come up for sale! Indeed, my own unit had a failed LED display and I managed to buy a complete unit that was already being scrapped on eBay and managed to salvage the parts to get mine going! If you can find a good working one, then they are well worth the money., but check out the LED and the LCD display (although that is very simple to replace) before you buy one.

I really liked my time with the Yamaha Rev5, it has many useful reverbs and the highly regarded Symphonic patch that is so revered on the SPX90. I probably should have kept it as I now miss it, so that has gotta mean something.

I bought one of these brand new back in the late 1980s and it was far better at the time than my trusty old spring reverb for percussion, but, even back then I found it to be quite noisy. By modern standards it’s quite harsh with a brittle sound. My favorite sounds was the flanged reverb, small rooms, and echo. These days I would probably not use one even it was given to me.