Latest User Reviews

Review

By Steve

Sound Quality 95%
Build Quality 95%
Usefullness 95%
Mojo/Funk 75%
Reliability 95%

WHY THE HELL DID I SELL IT!

By Steve

Sound Quality 95%
Build Quality 90%
Usefullness 100%
Mojo/Funk 70%
Reliability 90%

I originally bought this for room correction in a home stereo system, it worked beautifully for that purpose, but I ended up selling it as I no longer needed it for that purpose, but I really regret letting it go. It was simple to use, had totally transparent sound quality even though incoming sounds were converted to digital, and the reverse on the way out etc. Build quality was really solid too. It was probably one of the last great Mackie products, I have to get me another!

MXR MODEL 113 DIGITAL DELAY

By Art Boffi

Sound Quality 100%
Build Quality 100%
Usefullness 100%
Mojo/Funk 100%
Reliability 100%

Great unit. Durable (40 years old and still going unlike the imported stuff being offered today). I own several different delays (I.e. ADA, Lexicon, and multi effect units) and this thing matches up to the best of them. Recommended!

INCREDIBLE BOX OF TRICKS

By Steve

Sound Quality 100%
Build Quality 95%
Usefullness 100%
Mojo/Funk 100%
Reliability 100%

This is without a doubt, one of the very best effects boxes ever made. What it can do for a drum mix alone is worth the price of entry. Put the FATSO across your drum buss and they instantly become, fat! I like to drive the input hard (and lower the output) to ensure the tape saturation kicks in, and the compressor lights with two to four lights coming on. As well, I use a little bit of the warmth, and hey presto, big fat drums! It seems to work equally well on full mix as well, although I do not drive it so aggressively when I do.

I think many people misunderstand what this box is, which is fundamentally a TAPE simulator. It behaves the same way as when you drive levels onto tape very high, the top end rolls off, and the sound fattens up. So if you ever wanted to get that Studer 24″ tape sound, this is the ticket! I also have the UAD plugin which works pretty well, but I do prefer the hardware.

Review

By Bernd

Sound Quality 100%
Build Quality 95%
Usefullness 100%
Mojo/Funk 100%
Reliability 68%

SONIC VERSATILITY

By Lektromulus

Sound Quality 95%
Build Quality 85%
Usefullness 100%
Mojo/Funk 100%
Reliability 75%

My unit required extensive work including new, encoder knob, screen, all new capacitors and jumping and work in the input and output circuits because of leaky caps and a power supply rebuild. However, 2 years of running alongside lexicon, eventide, Strymon, and GFI processors and pedals the dp2 definitely holds its own! The phasers, flangers and pitch shifting are superb. The reverbs are hit and miss and some are a bit grainy or metallic in a funky way and others are good and still useful today. The 2 line display is a bit tedious but terse enough to work well enough. If you find one, buy it!

Dope

By Theo H

Sound Quality 100%
Build Quality 100%
Usefullness 100%
Mojo/Funk 100%
Reliability 100%

CHARISMATIC FX UNIT

By Anonymous

Sound Quality 90%
Build Quality 80%
Usefullness 90%
Mojo/Funk 70%
Reliability 85%

Many FX algorithm in this unit, and all are premium quality. Interface is a bit boring for editing, especially in 2DSP mode, but presets are good. (boring editing = bad mojo note) This unit has some secrets weapons in my point of view: fat “Roland” ultra-chorus, complex reverbs, even compressor algorithm is really cool, it gives my samples an EMU fat vibe. I had also an Ensoniq DP/PRO, sound quality is nearly the same although DSP is newer on PRO model, but reliability was poor on my PRO unit. This dp2 is a killer ;) (I “work” with lexicon, eventide, publison, roland space echo)

USEFUL!

By Anonymous

Sound Quality 90%
Build Quality 80%
Usefullness 95%
Mojo/Funk 95%
Reliability 80%

This unit has some really quality FXs. I like it for coloured reverbs and especially for its doubler-widening programs (I have not found such nice widening-doubler algos in plugins and I own…many. Eventide H3000 native, Soundtoys, many reverbs etc… ). It has also very very good phaser-flangers.

Review

By Alex909

Sound Quality 100%
Build Quality 80%
Usefullness 80%
Mojo/Funk 100%
Reliability 80%

FX PANZER

By Rene Kirchner

Sound Quality 90%
Build Quality 95%
Usefullness 95%
Mojo/Funk 95%
Reliability 95%

Had it in the studio from 2003 to 2016. Reliable and user friendly technique and quality. I really miss that thing. One of the best FX all rounder for electronic music studios! Design, Quality and FXs are premium!

I USE THREE OF THESE. HAVEN’T NEEDED A NEW FX PROCESSOR SINCE 1994!

By Anonymous

Sound Quality 80%
Build Quality 90%
Usefullness 100%
Mojo/Funk 95%
Reliability 80%

It does everything…four times over. I almost always use all four processors for a single source and get excellent results. A luxury I know since I have three available for use. Typically Vocals and Guitar are the two instruments that can gain from multiple effects. Vocals use a compressor, gating, eq, and reverb, leaving me some other effect to use intermittently such as chorus, echo, distortion, or flanging. Same for guitars. I’ll often use a amp simulator (3 types) and maybe a speaker simulator, leaving me with two other processors for multi-effects such as chorus-delay, or flanger-delay, or dual pitch shifting. You see, there are a lot of possibilities.

I’ve also used it live as 4 compressors – one for each vocal mic, but I found it better to just use two 1U dual compressors for the instant knobs twist and gain reduction LEDs. I have also used it as a dedicated voice processor for live use, and using all four processors in series can even make me sound good!

If you have the mixer, you can use to aux sends for two dual-processor effects, or if you have 4 sends, up to 4 individual effects. Once you understand the routing switching and the switching method of the jacks it’s easy to use 1, 2, or 4 effect in/outs. 3 effect in/out (as in two single and one dual effect) is not really supported, but easy enough to set up with a short patch cable. You just can’t switch it around from the front panel. That’s not so bad though since seldom will you need to change the number of ins and outs on the fly.

Drawback: Great MIDI implementation but sadly the volume control for delay line effects is on the output, not the input, so you will have a harder time queing the exact phrase that should be echoed. You will need a second processor before the delay effect to do that – not a problem if you wanted a second effect in series but it is a limitation.

The rooms and plates sound fine. So does the hall for some things but somehow the hall doesn’t seem so useful to me – I guess it has a bit of a quirky sound. So if you want a really freakin’ good reverb, I’d use the room & plate in parallel or series, or use some of the non-linear (i.e. reverse) reverbs. to me they sound better. The 8-voice chorus is to me a bit much – to smeary or something. I prefer the simpler eq-chorus-ddl effect since it has a cleaner chorus and includes more eq and delay effects that can be used or not.

The system has a lot of programability and that makes this very flexible. As one example, if you have one or up to four inputs, the output of the effect can still remain in stereo. It is mixed internally and output thru jacks 1 & 2, so only two returns are needed. If going mono, just use output 1 and all processors are summed to mono. This is all done with jack switching internally so there is no menu-configuration needed.

Look, I could go on and on with this unit. It has some drawbacks, but it is pretty awesome too. The fact that I have three of these, and continue to use them even now 25 or so years later, should be enough of an endorsement from me.