Klark Teknik DN 780 Digital Reverberator

Often referred to as the poor man's AMS RMX 16, the Klark Teknik DN 780 is a great reverb in its own right and has maintained a loyal following over the years. The Klark Teknik DN 780 digital Reverb is not simply a reverberation device. The Klark Teknik DN 780 gives the user a unique and flexible means of producing realistic acoustic simulations for environments of all types and sizes.

Klark Teknik DN 780 Digital Reverberator Details

The provision of effects programs further extends this versatility, making the Klark Teknik DN 780 the most powerful acoustic processing package currently available.

Not happy with current designs with narrow fields of useful application, our research has led to a new operating concept for the Klark Teknik DN 780 to extend versatility, backed by an advanced high speed digital signal processor designed to handle the necessarily complex computations.

This technical innovation results in extremely high-density reverberation with convincing small room performance, authentic concert hall reverberation and a wide-ranging choice of basic ‘acoustic spaces ‘, both natural and unnatural, selected by the innovative reflection ‘Pattern’ control.

The remaining controls give accurate adjustment of all reverberation parameters, including ‘Roam size’, and when used with the ‘Pattern’ control these allow the engineer to create unique acoustic environments of virtually any type.

A number of factory-set acoustic simulations are available: see ‘Software‘ section. It is important to note that all these very different sounds were created using only the controls you have available: for example, there is no dedicated ‘Room’ program as such. A room sound is created using the appropriate pattern (‘2’), and adjusting other parameters as required.

The factory-set memory locations should be used, then, as a reference point from which to create your own variation, forget the limitations of a dedicated system and let your creativity reign.

Fifty non-volatile memories are available for entering user variations and the sequence function allows instant recall of up to 16 factory or user memories in required order, allowing rapid movements through a series of previously planned acoustical settings for mix-down, film dubbing, t.v. production or live performance.

Klark Teknik RemoteThe remote-control unit (Shown to the right) allows the chosen acoustic setting to be first selected, using the sequence key and then modified using the parameter sliders.

The Klark Teknik DN 780 performs to the highest specification and is engineered using the latest technology to keep component count down and reliability up. Electronics use a semi-modular system of construction distributed logically on six printed circuit boards, eliminating unreliable edge connectors whilst avoiding the servicing problems of single board systems.

The Klark Teknik DN 780 is a compact 2U, 19-inch rack mounting device equally at home in the recording studio, dubbing suite, broadcasting studio or on the road.

Audio connectors are 3 pin XLR style, wired to the standard configuration. The input is electronically balanced as standard with transformer balancing available as an option. Outputs are transformer balanced.

The Klark Teknik DN 780 gives the operator enormous scope to use his creative skills to the full. To achieve this, wide ranging control is provided for all parameters; however, the basic operating procedure remains both simple and intuitive, giving immediate access to a wide range of factory set acoustic simulations.  A thorough understanding of this section will then enable the full capabilities of the DN780 to be realised.

The provision of 50 user memories, sequence function and remote-control unit means that ultimately, in practice, operation is reduced to pressing a single key (“Sequence”) on the remote unit and occasionally modifying a parameter using the remote sliders.

Unlike many dedicated reverberation only devices, the Klark Teknik DN 780 is also capable of running a number of different effects programs. These cover a wide range of applications from straight delay, through a variety of echo effects to the surreal sound of the Infinite Room Program.

The combination of excellent audio performance and digital signal processing power results in a performance advantage over most existing effects and echo devices. A poor man’s AMS RMX16? No, it is much better than that!

Specifications

  • Audio Input:
    • One, electronically balanced.
    • Impedance balanced: 20 kΩ
    • Unbalanced: 10 kΩ
  • Audio Outputs:
    • Two, fully floating transformer balanced
    • Minimum load impedance: 600 Ω
    • Source impedance: Less than 50 Ω
    • Maximum level: +21 dBm
  • Frequency response: +1, -2 dB (20 Hz – 12 kHz)
  • Distortion: 0.03% @ 1 kHz
  • Dynamic range: 85 dB typical
  • A/D & D/A convertors: 16-bit linear
  • Arithmetic processor: 32-bit
  • Memories:
    • 1-39: Factory set locations
    • 40-89: Non-volatile “read/write” user programmable locations
  • Reverberation: Hall, Plate, Chamber, Room, with 5 variations of each
  • Effects: Delay, ADT, Multitap Echo, Sound On Sound, Infinite Room
  • Parameters
    • Predelay: 0-990 milliseconds
    • Decay time: 0.1-99 seconds
    • Room size: 5-100 metres linear dimension (125-1,000,000 cubic metres)
    • LF decay: Adjustable ±7 increments relative to 1 kHz decay time
    • HF decay: Adjustable ±7 increments relative to 1 kHz decay time
    • Early reflections: 5 pattern variations; relative level adjustable in 10 steps (0-max)
  • Power requirements: 110/120/220/240 V, 50/60 Hz
  • Consumption: 40 VA
  • Weight: 7.5 kg
  • Dimensions: 482mm x 310mm x 89mm

TRY OUR ‘MY EFFECTS RACK’ FEATURE TO TRACK WHAT YOU HAVE IN YOUR EFFECTS RACK NOW, AND THOSE ITEMS YOU WISH TO ADD.

The details provided above are drawn from historical documents like advertising brochures or user manuals. They’re shared without bias or review. This info is given solely for your consideration, helping you gauge its usefulness to you.

User Reviews

Poor Man’s AMS

By Simon Alexander

Sound Quality 85%
Build Quality 85%
Usefullness 90%
Mojo/Funk 85%
Reliability 90%

So, this was a bit of an impulsive/curiosity purchase for me, as I’d heard quite a bit about this unit, and low and behold, one was offered to me at a silly price, along with the remote. The word on the street, is the DN780 was designed to be a ‘poor man’s AMS’? Now whether that’s true or not, I’m not sure, but there are plenty of ‘similarities’ when you instantly take a glance!

I’m not exactly sure when the 780 came out, but I’m guessing around 1984-86? but that’s the general time that the digital reverb market became affordable and other companies could Compete with the big players that had already got well established but cost a small fortune back then! The design of the 780 is pretty straightforward and I would be amazed if whoever designed it didn’t look at how the front panel of the RMX 16 was set out?

Operationally, it is very similar in someways to the AMS and differs in others… The front panel is very intuitive and nicely laid out (although I’m not a great fan of the multicoloured LED numerals) But I understand why they did it. The build quality of the 780 is pretty good and although it was built to a lesser budget, I would have to say, for the most part, it has stood up well to the test of time. I bought mine about five years ago and it had been sat around for quite some years before I got hold of it, and a few of the buttons needed cleaning (as did all the remote-control sliders). On the subject of the remote control, it is A nice addition and is very simple to use. Like a lot of reverbs that were supplied with remotes, sadly, quite a few have been lost over time and they are extremely difficult to find on their own…Now onto the sound.

The DN780 Is a great sounding reverb. It has all the usual variations of hall, plate, vocal and nonlinear algorithms and is fully Programmable with plenty of user memory locations (which the AMS sadly lacks) As you’d expect, it is not an AMS (In terms of its sound quality) but being fair, a few of the algorithms are not that far off!

My honest opinion is that if you are comparing the two (as I am) Then you would automatically gravitate towards the AMS, but let’s also be fair and reflect on the fact that the AMS was over three time the price when it came out! As a general reverb around a budget, it really isn’t that far behind! And here in the U.K, a good DM780 will cost you about a grand, and an AMS £3.5-£4k! so value for money is open to personal opinion and preference? Considering how much they were when they were new, and how much they go for now on the second-hand market, I have to say that the DN 780 is excellent value for money and easily stand up to being a useful main (or secondary) studio reverb.

To sum up, I was very impressed when I got mine and I have used it on various things such as keyboards and drums, where I have actually preferred some of its algorithms compared to some of the bigger Lexicon and AMS rivals. If you can find one in good condition along with the remote, I would strongly advise buying one and adding it as a useful addition. They’re not that common here and seem to be getting more on people’s ‘radar list’ as something to try and buy.

Possible immediate attention may be needed to replace the ventilation fans inside, as they weren’t the best quality ones used, and they may all have noisy bearings. I replaced mine very easily and fairly inexpensively. Generally they are fairly stable and a lot less Intricate inside (compared to things such as the AMS) parts are fairly easy to obtain too, such as remote sliders, replacement fans and volume pots..

MY FAVORITE REVERB

By Anonymous

Sound Quality 100%
Build Quality 100%
Usefullness 100%
Mojo/Funk 100%
Reliability 100%

Most of the reverbs, inclusive IR-Reverbs, makes good jobs, when you hear them alone. I my case I love the DN 780 for its unspectacular way it fixes my mixes. Its my analogest digital reverb. Yes, I replaced the fan, I replaced the bridge rectifier and the battery. Now my DN 780 works like new, without noise. I give 10 point to all, because it is in view of its age an absolut authentic representative of the sustainability engineering of these great 80s!

TOO OLD SCHOOL FOR MY TASTE…AND YES THE FANS FAIL

By Me FX

Sound Quality 50%
Build Quality 60%
Usefullness 40%
Mojo/Funk 35%
Reliability 35%

Yes the previous reviewer is correct…the fans in these go bad…had to replace the one in mine. Some of the buttons were bad too, dirty and intermittent common in units this old. Sound wise I found it too flutterly 80s…not worth it for my tastes, nothing really magic in there. Yeah maybe the non lin is kinda cool, but how often do you have a use for non lin.

Editing was slow too, and not much variation available. The stock presets were useless like either way too bright or dark, no safe middle ground, or just plain weird too effecty unusable “show off” presets you’ll never use but sound impressive as overblown effects, like many units have, to sell them with the wow factor but you never use those.

DESIRABLE BUT CAN BE UNRELIABLE

By Anonymous

Sound Quality 85%
Build Quality 90%
Usefullness 85%
Mojo/Funk 75%
Reliability 70%

The Klark Teknik DN 780 is often referred to as a poor man’s AMS RMX16, some suggest the algorithms are ported from the AMS, with the DN 780 being more affordable and albeit lower quality digital reverb when compared to the AMS. However it is a very good reverb in it’s own right and has one of the best Non Linear reverb presets of any reverb from this period in my view. You do have to be careful with the fan on the rear panel, because if it fails the power supply WILL overheat and blow. You are best served by paying a technician to replace it. Other than that, like all Klark Teknik gear it is a very solid unit that proves more than useful in a studio for mixing.

Used it? Leave your rating and review.

Audio Samples
Alternatives

Currently no information available…

Plugin Alternatives
Famous Racks
Related Articles

Leave a Reply

Just a Quick

Question?

Can you tell us quickly what it is you love about Vintage Digital, and what it is you would like to see more of on the site? Is there anything you think we should add?
Let us know!